bladespark: (Default)
[personal profile] bladespark
Look. There is literally NO benefit to confusing "the party of the first part" legalistic language. Well, unless you're predatory and want to be confusing. The point of a contract is to spell out exactly what two parties are agreeing to. So SAY IT IN PLAIN ENGLISH.

*grumps*

I am cranky right now. I liked Jaffa books. I made squat with them, but I was their first author, we've had a relationship for years and years, their contracts were always short, straightforward, in plain English, and they only wanted fairly limited rights. The new publisher basically wants all rights to everything (they are a tiny niche press, they only print books, they don't even do audiobooks, WHY are they asking for audio, radio, and movie rights????) and their reversion clause isn't utter shit but it's unnecessarily convoluted and ass-covering. You do not need TWO YEARS notice to reprint something that's gone out of print.

We're not living in the dark ages here, nobody has to hand-set type anymore.

Bleh.

I mean, they've said I'm free to negotiate the contract, but I don't want to even HAVE to. "Oh, we may have offered you shit, you can ask for it to be less shit" is soooooooooooooooooooooo not promising to me when considering dealing with somebody.

:(

Date: 2019-03-09 06:45 am (UTC)
duskpeterson: The lowercased letters D and P, joined together (Default)
From: [personal profile] duskpeterson
Yeah, I once decided not to submit to a press when I realized I'd have to ask for two dozen contract changes. (That press asked for *toy* rights.)

On the other hand, I've gone through contact negotiations where I got virtually everything I asked for. So, um, good luck?

Profile

bladespark: (Default)
Aidan Rhiannon

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 2728 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 20th, 2026 08:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios