The Bible.
Consists of two books, the Old and the New Testaments.
The Old Testament = history of the Jewish people, Moses, Abraham, Adam, lots of wars, the Ten Commandments, the Levite law for Israelites, and a bunch of prophecies, some of which are about Christ, but most of which are about the destruction of Jerusalem, and the end of the world.
The New Testament = teachings of Jesus Christ, plus the story of his birth, ministry, crucifixion, and return from death, and then some letters his followers wrote to each other after that.
Now. If you are Christian (not Jewish, Christian,) which of these two books is the most important?
This should be a no-brainer here.
And yet outside of Mormonism I have NEVER seen anybody say that the New Testament's teachings are more important than the Old. When people argue "but the Bible says X and it says Y, and they contradict each other!" they never even bring up that X is OT and Y is NT. I just finished reading a huge long rant about the ten commandments and how they're stupid, and not really good moral guides because they were mostly about not having idols and not working on Sunday and so on, and I just went "duh!" Of course they're not, they're OT. The sermon on the mount is the good moral guide of the Bible for Christians because it's NT, so it's what Christ said.
Am I alone here? Why do people not distinguish between NT and OT? They just say "The Bible." The Bible is TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT BOOKS!!!!!
I am a Christian. This means that if I find the Bible saying "stone anybody who works on the Sabbath" and I also find the Bible saying "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath," I don't need to think really hard about which of these two statements is more important. Moses said the first one, and Christ said the second one. I'm Christian, not Jewish, so I'm going to follow the second one.
Duh.
Consists of two books, the Old and the New Testaments.
The Old Testament = history of the Jewish people, Moses, Abraham, Adam, lots of wars, the Ten Commandments, the Levite law for Israelites, and a bunch of prophecies, some of which are about Christ, but most of which are about the destruction of Jerusalem, and the end of the world.
The New Testament = teachings of Jesus Christ, plus the story of his birth, ministry, crucifixion, and return from death, and then some letters his followers wrote to each other after that.
Now. If you are Christian (not Jewish, Christian,) which of these two books is the most important?
This should be a no-brainer here.
And yet outside of Mormonism I have NEVER seen anybody say that the New Testament's teachings are more important than the Old. When people argue "but the Bible says X and it says Y, and they contradict each other!" they never even bring up that X is OT and Y is NT. I just finished reading a huge long rant about the ten commandments and how they're stupid, and not really good moral guides because they were mostly about not having idols and not working on Sunday and so on, and I just went "duh!" Of course they're not, they're OT. The sermon on the mount is the good moral guide of the Bible for Christians because it's NT, so it's what Christ said.
Am I alone here? Why do people not distinguish between NT and OT? They just say "The Bible." The Bible is TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT BOOKS!!!!!
I am a Christian. This means that if I find the Bible saying "stone anybody who works on the Sabbath" and I also find the Bible saying "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath," I don't need to think really hard about which of these two statements is more important. Moses said the first one, and Christ said the second one. I'm Christian, not Jewish, so I'm going to follow the second one.
Duh.