Exploring multiplicity.
Jan. 10th, 2007 03:48 amThere are 111 people on my friends list.
Of those, there are eight that I am aware of who have some form of multiplicity. That is, there's somebody else keeping them company in their heads. Whethere completely separate personalities, or characters with a life of their own, or aspects, or whatever.
That's 7.something percent. If you count me, it makes it nine out of 112, so it's actually 8.something.
That's a pretty high percentage, really. Even if you take just those who seriously identify as multiple, there's at least four.
And I may not even know of them all, since I don't know everyone on that list well, and it's quite possible to be very quietly multiple. Textbooks tell you that Dissasociative Identity Disorder (the current "proper" term for multiple personalities,) is perishingly rare.
What I think is that though Dissasociative Identity Disorder may be very rare, Dissasociative Identities are not. It's merely that most of us are completely functional, and there's nothing wrong with us, so we never see the need to get treated for it. Though I probably still can't quite qualify as Disassociative, I'm too well integrated. I'm too much of a single person, really. The only voices that are even anywhere near being their own personalities entirely are the Aidans, (though if they were, I think they'd be just one, with two aspects of his own,) Yin, and Guardian.
If you all can't tell, this subject totally fascinates me.
Of those, there are eight that I am aware of who have some form of multiplicity. That is, there's somebody else keeping them company in their heads. Whethere completely separate personalities, or characters with a life of their own, or aspects, or whatever.
That's 7.something percent. If you count me, it makes it nine out of 112, so it's actually 8.something.
That's a pretty high percentage, really. Even if you take just those who seriously identify as multiple, there's at least four.
And I may not even know of them all, since I don't know everyone on that list well, and it's quite possible to be very quietly multiple. Textbooks tell you that Dissasociative Identity Disorder (the current "proper" term for multiple personalities,) is perishingly rare.
What I think is that though Dissasociative Identity Disorder may be very rare, Dissasociative Identities are not. It's merely that most of us are completely functional, and there's nothing wrong with us, so we never see the need to get treated for it. Though I probably still can't quite qualify as Disassociative, I'm too well integrated. I'm too much of a single person, really. The only voices that are even anywhere near being their own personalities entirely are the Aidans, (though if they were, I think they'd be just one, with two aspects of his own,) Yin, and Guardian.
If you all can't tell, this subject totally fascinates me.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:56 am (UTC)Or not so much that that you're just adding things to yourself, memories and ideas and experiences and thoughts and things you've read or seen or dreamed and there's so much stuff in there that it starts sticking together and taking on a life of it's own.
Hrm. Or actually more like when you're then put under stress (because almost all my personas have turned up when I was under stress) all that stuff starts oozing out the edges to form something else.
Which would be why there's that high percentage of multiples in my lj, because I know a lot of creative people.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 12:33 pm (UTC)... my god but I'm cynical this morning. Excuse me. I'm going to go track down a picture of a baby fox or something, and try to cheer up.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 12:38 pm (UTC)Before coming onto lj I had no idea there were ANY other multiples that weren't severe and dysfunctional out there. We blend in, we look and often act just like everybody else.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 01:07 pm (UTC)There's a few people on my list who identify in such a way, and I think it's much to do with the mentality of those people I make friends with, and who might do the same with me. Though I don't know for certain, it's certainly a plausible idea that some people might be so able to do this thing and just not take the mental leap of acknowledging it, whether by choice or by not interpreting it in such a way.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 01:36 pm (UTC)I'd be interested to hear whether there are correlations between disassociativeness and intellect or creativity or stress or any other factor that happens to show up.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 09:43 pm (UTC)Of course that's assuming that you have a good counselor. Were I stuck with a bad one I certainly wouldn't tell!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 02:07 pm (UTC)There's four of us here. There always has been...
Why is it? Hell if I know. Could I live without it? Sure...but that'd be like asking if I could live without some of my best friends.
I suppose the lot of us are lucky, we have access to eachother's memmorie (for the most part) and some of eachothers abilities. (Roanoke actually has different abilities than I do. Say for instance, he can tune a guitar, and I have no idea how to do it...) Though, sometimes we do show through as 'different' to people. (Like say, when Roanoke's in the driver's seat. Or when Wolf's co-driving..)
Im kind of curious as to how creativity effects this sort of thing as well...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 03:33 pm (UTC)We all have seperate lives, seperate dreams, seperate emotions.
Anyway...If you'd like to know more, our email is the.fragments.system at gmail.com
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 03:50 pm (UTC)-Kat
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:48 pm (UTC)Syn, Kin, Jaci, Yu, they all have their function in the way i work, but i suppose they are not so independent from one another....
hard to really say.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-11 07:02 am (UTC)Which is as it should be, really. We're all different, and that's good. If things were more black and white, you could just file everybody handily it two categories "single" and "multiple" and that kind of division of humans never ends well.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-11 05:34 am (UTC)four of my friends have these same aspects, and we call the groups of them by different names (colors, splits, mirrors, mindbabies, etc.) I have a GreatestJournal for all of them to express themselves on (mirrorforest http://www.greatestjournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=mirrorforest if ya wanna check it out)
Unfortunately, I *do* also exhibit a lot of the symptoms psychologists associate with DID, so I'm not too good an example of healthy people living out there with it, I guess :/ but then again, how much do people *really* know about the mind anyway?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-11 06:59 am (UTC)As far as if you qualify as multiple, to me the borederline is, can your personalities do things that you tell them not to? Mine can't. They occasionally do things I didn't really expect, but that's normal, one's own subconcious can surprise one quite easily. They backtalk a bit sometimes, particularly when I'm stressed and all the different bits of me want to fly off in different directions in response to it. But they can't do anything if I tell them not to.
Of course forbidding them things has weird effects. (Surpressing part of yourself is tricky, after all.) Any time you block of something that your mind wants, it tends to leak out somewhere else. But still, if they're actual personalities, and not just aspects, they'll be able to ignore your directions of they want, whereas aspects, as part of you, eventually have to listen up.